National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy
National Miss ile Defens e If U.S. national missile defense (NMD) were only about countering ballistic missiles deployed by rogue states,1 then whether to deploy limited NMD would be a “normal” national security issue. The military-technical question would concern feasibility: Would the missile defense work against the small missile forces that a few states may eventually deploy? The military-p...
متن کاملBattlefield weapons and missile defense: Worrisome developments in nuclear South Asia
Two recent developments in South Asia have increased the risk of an accelerated arms race between India and Pakistan. One development is PakistanÕs introduction of theNasrmissile, a very-short-range, ÒtacticalÓ nuclear weapon that threatens IndiaÕs conventional forces and could also tempt other countries to develop battlefieldusable nuclear weapons. The other development is IndiaÕs announcement...
متن کاملThe Airborne Laser and the Future of Theater Missile Defense
The theater ballistic missile (TBM) problem encountered in the Persian Gulf War revealed an alarming deficiency in US defenses. This paper takes a brief look at the major theater missile defense (TMD) systems in use and under development by the US today. Second, it focuses on the performance of the Army’s Patriot defense system in the Gulf War. Finally, the paper fulfills its main purpose of of...
متن کاملThe Impact of National Missile Defense on Nonproliferation Regimes
Dr. James Clay Moltz is Associate Director and Research Professor at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, where he also heads the Newly Independent States Nonproliferation Program. He is co-editor of The North Korean Nuclear Program: Security, Strategy, and New Perspectives from Russia (Routledge, 2000) and the author of articles in Arms Co...
متن کاملNUCLEAR WEAPONS AND NATIONAL PRESTIGE By
Leaders and historians see prestige as important, but international relations theorists have neglected the concept, in part for lack of a clear definition. It is proposed that a party “holds prestige” when group members generally believe that they generally believe that the party has a certain desirable quality, and this situation gives the party perceived power in the group. The definition gai...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Security
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0162-2889,1531-4804
DOI: 10.1162/016228801753212859